Legal Opinion
Dombeck v. Milwaukee Valve Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 18, 1994No. Nos. 93-2606, 93-2718, 93-2798, 93-3256, 93-3375 and 94-1525PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal requires that we decide what effect should be given a jury verdict rendered on a sexual harassment claim when it is later determined that the plaintiff had no right to a jury trial. Marina Dombeck maintains that her employer, the Milwaukee Valve Company (“MVC”), subjected her to a hostile work environment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 when one of its employees verbally and physically harassed her and MVC failed to respond adequately to her complaints. At trial, Dombeck produced substantial evidence to support her claim, and a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Lehman v. NakshianSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hashimoto v. DaltonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Ilona of Hungary, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Mark J. Bruso v. United Airlines, Incorporated, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Carmelo Melendez v. Illinois Bell Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Mark B. Lebow v. American Trans Air, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.