Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. White v. Mills
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 5, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.
The Assistant State’s Attorney had power to sign the writ “in the absence or disqualification of the State’s Attorney,” and until the contrary appears, we must presume that he acted in accordance with his statutory authority (§ 5480). Hellman v. Karp, 93 Conn. 317, 323, 105 Atl. 678; Atwater v. O’Reilly, 81 Conn. 367, 371, 71 Atl. 505; State v. Main, 69 Conn. 123, 140, 37 Atl. 80.
By the charter of the city of Norwalk (16 Special Laws, p. 1055, § 55) the Council is authorized, “whenever any elective officer of said town or city . .' . shall be convicted of malfeasance in office or of any…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- People Ex Rel. Wood v. Board of Assessors & Collector of TaxesNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Hellman v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- State ex rel. Hathorn v. United States Express Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Ammidon v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Silberman v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
- Leventhal v. JenningsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Erickson v. MagieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Chester v. WalkerConnecticut Superior Court · 1949