Legal Opinion

Saechao v. Matsakoun

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1986No. TC A8406-03428; CA A34147; SC S32866PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court entered a final judgment dismissing two of the three personal injury claims. The plaintiff guardian ad litem appealed the judgment to the Court of Appeals which affirmed the trial court in an in banc 6-4 decision. The Court of Appeals ruled in effect that emotional distress resulting from witnessing the death in an accident of a family member is compensable in a tort action only if there was a direct impact of the accident to the person suffering the emotional distress.

The plaintiff guardian ad litem petitioned for review. We allowed review. Before argument,…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Folz v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hammond v. Central Lane Communications CenterOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Philibert v. KluserOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Nelson E. Outten, Jr. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation A/K/A AmtrakCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. Wilson v. TobiassenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API