Legal Opinion

Nelson E. Outten, Jr. v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation A/K/A Amtrak

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 13, 1991No. 90-1520PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

This appeal requires us to revisit the issue of the permissible scope of a claim by a railroad employee against his employer alleging damages for injuries of an emotional nature only. Nelson E. Outten, Jr. appeals from the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) in Outten’s negligence action brought pursuant to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. (1988) (“FELA”). Outten contends that the district court erred as a matter of law in holding that Outten was…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mr. & Mrs. Henry Plaisance, Jr. v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. United States v. John Russell BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  3. James E. Gottshall v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  4. Daily v. BoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Alan Carlisle v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API