Legal Opinion

Hauser v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 3, 1928PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.

— That the plaintiff was a passenger on one of defendant’s trains is admitted. Briefly stated, as such passenger shé went into the toilet room of the coach on which she was riding, and while there fainted, and fell to the floor, with the result that her face came in contact with a steam pipe located near the floor of the toilet room, and she, was seriously' burned and injured. The only ground of negligence charged against the railroad company is that it failed to properly install guards or protection, so that one coming into contact with such heating apparatus would not be burned and injured.

B…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Weber v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Stierle v. . Union Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Kellow v. Central Iowa R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Cronk v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Adduci v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Merritt v. Interstate Transit LinesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
  2. Alva Wilson v. Capital AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  3. Sulhoff v. EverettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API