Sulhoff v. Everett
Supreme Court of Iowa
1ConcurrenceMiller, J.
(specially concurring) — I believe that the opinion herein reaches the correct result in this case but I am unable to concur in that part of the opinion which would overrule the opinion of this court in the ease of McMullen v. M. &. M. Hotel Co., 227 Iowa 1061, 290 N. W. 3. The facts in that case are so different from the facts presented by the record herein that it is entirely unnecessary to overrule the McMullen case to decide this case and I am firmly of the opinion that the McMullen case was decided on sound principles of law.
In the case of Keeran v. Spurgeon Mercantile Co., 194 Iowa…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Glaser v. RothschildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- Main v. LehmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Keeran v. Spurgeon Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Hudson v. Church of the Holy TrinityNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Ward v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.