Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Vantaggi

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1944No. Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 42,583PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

For a statement of tbe facts leading up to tbe instant case, see Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York v. Vantaggi, 300 Micb. 528. Ray Laska, an employee of. defendant, suffered a compensable injury wbicb be reported to defendant’s foreman. Defendant claimed that be was never informed of tbe injury until Laska filed bis application for compensation with tbe department of labor and industry. Had tbe employer been informed by tbe foreman, it would have been a very simple matter for him to notify plaintiff and thereupon tbe employer’s liability would have been assumed by plaintiff, tbe…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Co. v. BissellMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Risor v. Nebraska BoilerNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. United National Indemnity Co. v. SangiulianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Morley v. Standish Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Morley v. Standish Creamery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API