Blitch-Everett Co. v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from Chatham superior court — Judge Meldrim. February 2, 1922.
1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.
Section 5869 of the Civil Code and section 1043 of the Penal Code each provide as follows: “ In all cases either party has the right to have the witnesses of the other party examined out of the hearing of each other. The court will take proper care to effect this object as far as practicable and convenient, but any mere irregularity shall not exclude the witness.” Prior to the adoption of the code, the English rule, applicable to criminal cases, as laid down by Mr. Chitty, was quoted and approved by the Supreme Court in Johnson v. State, 14 Ga. 55, 62, as follows: “ Before the examination…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shaw v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Keller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Davis v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Turbaville v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Putman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Chedel v. MooneySupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Hall v. HallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Howard v. EcholsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Walker v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.