Howard v. Echols
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Action for damages; from Forsyth superior court—Judge Blair. March 10, 1923.
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
This was an action for the alleged seduction of the plaintiff’s daughter. A verdict was found for the plaintiff. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, and he excepted.
1. In one of the grounds of the motion for a new trial it is complained that the court erred in refusing to allow a witness to testify in behalf of the defendant, on the ground that the proffered witness had remained in the court-room in violation of an order for the sequestration of the witnesses. Some time before the filing of the action a warrant had been issued for the arrest of the defendant on the charge of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blitch-Everett Co. v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Cunningham v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
3Cited by10 opinions
- Palmer v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron-Workers, Local 387 v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Dudley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
- Rozier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.