Hill v. Palms
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
STOKES, Justice.
Appellant, Robert L. Hill, instituted this action against the appellees, A. H. Palms and R. E. Palms, to recover damages for personal injuries inflicted upon him by a dog belonging to appellee R. E. Palms. The record shows that on April 22, 1948, appellant took his dog to the veterinary hospital of appellee, A. H. Palms, for treatment. In the early evening of April 28th he returned to the hospital to procure his dog or inquire about its condition. Upon arrival there he knocked upon the door and received no response. He observed a residence about 50 feet north of the hospital…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Carlisle v. J. Weingarten, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
- Kallum v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Dakan v. HumphreysCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Trinity & Sabine Railway Co. v. O'BrienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
- Herring v. SchinglerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
3Cited by10 opinions
- Marshall v. RanneTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Lewis v. Great Southwest CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Wells v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
- Labaj v. VanHouten, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
- Kelly Kanton Labaj and Third Coast Auto Group, LP v. DeeAnn VanHouten, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.