Legal Opinion

Neill v. Klobas

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1961No. Civ. 19453PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, J. pro tem. *

Plaintiffs and cross-defendants, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, the owners of real prop erty in Richmond, entered into a written contract with defendants and cross-complainants, hereinafter referred to as defendants, for the construction of a “multiplex” of 11 units with carports. The contract price was $54,880, payable in five installments of $8,476 each, and a note and trust deed for $12,500 payable on or before completion. Plaintiffs arranged to finance construction through the Mechanics Bank of Richmond which placed $33,000 in plaintiffs’ loan account,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Andrews v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Swanson v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Logoluso v. LogolusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Simoni v. SimoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Hake v. WiedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API