Neill v. Klobas
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, J. pro tem. *
Plaintiffs and cross-defendants, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, the owners of real prop erty in Richmond, entered into a written contract with defendants and cross-complainants, hereinafter referred to as defendants, for the construction of a “multiplex” of 11 units with carports. The contract price was $54,880, payable in five installments of $8,476 each, and a note and trust deed for $12,500 payable on or before completion. Plaintiffs arranged to finance construction through the Mechanics Bank of Richmond which placed $33,000 in plaintiffs’ loan account,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Coughlin v. BlairCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Andrews v. CunninghamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Swanson v. WheelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3Cited by3 opinions
- Logoluso v. LogolusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Simoni v. SimoniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hake v. WiedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963