Legal Opinion

Morgan v. City of Rhinelander

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1899PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Oneida county: ~W. O. SilveRthoest, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtCassoday, C. J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling a demurrer to the complaint, alleging, in effect, that July 15, 1896, the plaintiff, while lawfully traveling upon the sidewalk in the defendant city, at the place described, stepped upon a broken board or hole in such sidewalk, so defective by negligence of the city, and broke his leg, and was otherwise injured; that within ninety days after the injury the plaintiff gave notice to the city clerk, in writing, of the injury, and the place where it occurred, describing the insufficiency and' want of repair, causing the injury, and claimed satisfaction…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sheel v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Mason v. City of AshlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Telford v. City of AshlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Watson v. City of AppletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Koch v. City of AshlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lyon v. City of Grand RapidsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hay v. City of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Bunker v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Morrison v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Read v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API