Legal Opinion
McInnish v. Bentley
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided August 24, 2012No. 1110321, 1110325, 1110330, and 1110506PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOODALL, Justice.
These proceedings (one petition for the writ of mandamus and three appeals) were brought in this Court to challenge a judgment of the Montgomery Circuit Court awarding Hugh Mclnnish $196,625 in attorney fees and costs in his action against (1) the Governor of the State of Alabama, (2) the State finance director, (8) the State comptroller, and (4) the State treasurer, all in their official capacities (referred to collectively as “the State officials”), in which the Joint Fiscal Committee of the Alabama Legislature (“the committee”) intervened. As to cases no. 1110325, no.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Patterson v. Gladwin Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
- Lyons v. River Road Constr., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Jensen v. Traders & General Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Ex Parte Town of LowndesboroSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- ALABAMA AGR. AND MECHANICAL UNIV. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ala. Dep't of Human Res. v. AllenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017
- Ala. Medicaid Agency v. Southcrest BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- Ala. Medicaid Agency v. Southcrest BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
- McInnish v. BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2012