Webster v. Williams
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Macomb. (Stevens, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
ÜHAMPLiNj J.
Plaintiffs brought suit before a justice of the peace against. defendant, and on the return-day of the summons the parties appeared, and plaintiffs declared orally *136upon all the common counts in assumpsit. The defendant pleaded the general issue. The plaintiffs filed a bill of particulars of their demand.
Upon the trial of the cause it appeared from the evidence that the items contained in the bill of particulars accrued in favor of the firm of E. E. Webster & Co., composed of the present plaintiffs and one James Eobb; that this firm was dissolved, and a new one formed, consisting…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wilcox v. Toledo & Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Manhard v. SchottMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Maxwell v. DeensMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Snell v. GregoryMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Cilley v. Van PattenMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Worden Grocer Co. v. BlandingMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Thompson v. W. W. Kimball Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916