Legal Opinion

Gomez v. Hawaiian Gazette Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

EXCEPTIONS PROM CIRCUIT COURT, FlRST CIRCUIT.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

JUDD, C.J.

In this case the plaintiff obtained a verdict and a bill of exceptions was allowed the defendants. The case was tried in the Circuit Court, First Circuit, it being an action of trespass on the case in which plaintiff claimed damages of the defendant corporation and its manager, for an alleged libel published in the Pacific Commercial Advertiser, a newspaper printed and published by the said defendants, in the issue of November 30, 1893.

*109Tbe alleged defamatory words taken from tbe declaration and omitting tbe innendoes are as follows: “Gomez and bis dope. Tbe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pollard v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Redway v. GraySupreme Court of Vermont · 1858

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Aku v. LewisHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Kahanamoku v. Advertiser PubLishing Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Baldwin v. Hilo Tribune-Herald, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Van Poole v. Nippu Jiji Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Wright v. Hilo Tribune-Herald, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API