Legal Opinion

National Life & Accident Insurance v. Threlkeld

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 30, 1934No. 4-3431PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). Appellant insists that the policy of insurance was avoided because the insured in his application therefor wilfully and knowingly made misrepresentations with the intent to deceive the company as to his physical condition. There is no evidence here, however, directly tending to show any such representations, or that such misrepresentations had been wilfully and knowingly made as to his physical condition. Three witnesses, two of them disinterested, testified that insured was in apparent good health both at the time the application for insurance was made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Order of United Commercial Travelers v. McAdamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Harper v. Bankers' Reserve Life Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
  4. Roberson v. RobersonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  5. Wilbon v. Washington Fidelity National InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Southern National Insurance Co. v. HeggieSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  2. Federal Life Insurance v. HaseSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  3. Shearman Concrete Pipe Co. v. WooldridgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  4. CITIZENS COACH COMPANY v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  5. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. RameySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API