Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Pershan

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 11, 1949PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGarey, S.

There remains to be determined in this proceeding the question of the right and duty of the trustees to set aside a depreciation reserve and maintain the same out of rents collected by them before arriving at the net income available for distribution. The court holds that the trustees have not only the right, but are under a duty, to set aside a part of the rents received by them as a reserve for physical depreciation, caused by wear, tear and obsolescence, as distinguished from depreciation in value because of economic factors.

The question arises by the objections and answer of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Towne v. EisnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. International Stevedoring Co. v. HavertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Farmers Cooperative Co. v. BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949
  2. In Re Trust Created by WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. In re the Estate of DaviesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  4. Estate of TynanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Shilowitz v. ShilowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API