Water and Mining Co. v. Bugbey
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. The facts áre stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
This was an action of ejectment,- brought by Bugbey, the defendant in error, against the Natoma Water and Mining Company, the plaintiff in error, to recover possession of a part of ■the south half of section 16, township 10 north, of range 8 east, ■ Mount Diablo base and meridian, in the State of California. - He claimed title by grant from the Státe, and- the company under the act of Congress of March 8, 1853, “ to provide for the survey of public lands in California, the granting of preemption rights therein, and for other purposes.”' (10 Stat. 244), and the act of July 29,1866, “ granting…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sherman v. BuickSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kansas Pacific Railway Co. v. DunmeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Whitney v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Mining Co. v. Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Favot v. KingsburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Horsky v. MoranMontana Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.