Legal Opinion
United States v. Brand
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided December 31, 1998No. 97-4336PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Chief Judge:
We address issues of first impression in this appeal from a conviction under the Child Support Recovery Act of 1992 (CSRA or Act), Pub.L. No. 102-521, § 2, 106 Stat. 3403 (1992) (current version at 18 U.S.C.A. § 228). 1 After a trial before, a magistrate judge in the Southern District of Florida, appellant Abraham Brand was found guilty of willfully failing to pay a past due support obligation, in violation of the CSRA. Upon conviction, the magistrate judge ordered Brand to pay in excess of $4 million in restitution to his ex-wife. Brand now challenges his conviction,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. National Dairy Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. Frank P. Bongiorno, United States of America v. Frank P. BongiornoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Gary Nelson JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Timothy Gordon FaasseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. BigfordCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Clifford KerleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Lester MatticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.