Legal Opinion

Bottman v. Springfield Public Schools

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 12, 2024No. 6:22-cv-01900Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PETER BOTTMAN, an individual, Plaintiff, Civ. No. 6:22-cv-01900-MC v. OPINION AND ORDER SPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS, a public school district, and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, Inclusive, Defendant. MCSHANE, Judge: In response to Oregon’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate issued in October of 2021, Defendant Springfield Public Schools (“District”) required all teachers to be vaccinated unless they qualified for an exemption. Plaintiff Peter Bottman requested a religious and a medical exemption. He was granted the medical exemption and was placed on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Faragher v. City of Boca RatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Texas v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API