Legal Opinion

Penner v. Whitesell

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1976No. 9950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TITUS, Judge.

Plaintiffs say they have a son-student in the R-2 School District High School at El *773Dorado Springs and that defendants (members of the board of education, principal of the high school and superintendent of the school district) require each student to make a refundable book deposit before textbooks are issued. Claiming the book-deposit requirement violated the Free Textbook Law (§ 170.051, V.A.M.S.) and certain provisions of the Missouri Constitution, plaintiffs first sought a writ of mandamus to make defendants furnish their son with necessary textbooks “free of charge and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Varnal v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Brandon v. HickeyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. Butler v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Sierk v. ReynoldsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norval v. WhitesellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
  2. State v. CsolakMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Board of Regents v. HarrimanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Estate of Davis v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API