Legal Opinion
Coleman v. Maxwell
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided August 17, 1967No. Civ. A. Nos. 7707 and 66-C-80PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KinNbaey, District Judge.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus in which petitioner seeks relief pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2241. After a trial by jury in the Court of Common Pleas 'of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, defendant was found guilty of receiving and concealing stolen property. The judgment of conviction was affirmed by the Court of-Appeals for the Eighth Judicial District of Ohio. Following his conviction, petitioner filed a motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. This motion was denied, and that denial was affirmed on appeal by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cagle v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1980
- Coleman v. MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Clarence Coleman v. E. L. Maxwell, Warden, Ohio PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- United States ex rel. Moore v. PowellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1972