Legal Opinion
Frenkel v. Frenkel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 6, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
252 N.J. Super. 214 (1991)
599 A.2d 595
STEPHEN FRENKEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
MICHELLE FRENKEL, DEFENDANT, LANDI & KESSLER, INTERVENOR-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 22, 1991.
Decided December 6, 1991.
Before Judges MICHELS, HAVEY and CONLEY.
Joel Kessler argued the cause for intervenor-appellant Landi & Kessler (Landi & Kessler, attorneys, pro se; Joel Kessler, of counsel and on the brief).
No appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff-respondent Stephen Frenkel.
The opinion of the court was delivered by MICHELS, P.J.A.D.
We granted intervenor Messrs.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Robinson v. . RogersNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Joseph P. Jenkins v. Honorable Zita L. Weinshienk, Judge of the United States District Court for the District of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
- Pomerantz v. SchandlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Brauer v. Hotel Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
- H. & H. Ranch Homes, Inc. v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- The Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. Steven M. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Home Savings of America SSB v. Malart, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993
- Tannenbaum v. Smith (In Re Smith)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. RandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.