Legal Opinion
Nash v. Hoopes
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided January 9, 1975PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAYLOR, Judge.
On August 16, 1972, plaintiff and defendant Hoopes and Sudduth Associates, Inc. [H&S] entered into a contract whereby H&S agreed to convy to plaintiff the property at 229 West 30th Street, Wilmington, Delaware for $11,500.00. The purchase price was to consist of $1,200.00 payable in installments and the assumption by H&S agreed to convey to plaintiff the amount of $10,300.00. On June 6, 1972, prior to execution of the contract, the holder of the outstanding mortgage on the property had filed foreclosure proceedings. The foreclosure was based upon default in payments which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reynolds v. WillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- J. J. White, Inc. v. Metropolitan Merchandise Mart, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1954
- In Re Brandywine Volkswagen, Ltd.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Guthridge v. Pen-Mod, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1967
- Brandywine Volkswagen, Ltd. v. State, Department of Community Affairs & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Casson v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1982
- Curtis Lumber Co., Inc. v. Louisiana Pacific Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.