Legal Opinion

State v. Withers

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 14, 1968No. 68SC147PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

Defendant’s principal assignment of error is directed to the trial court’s action in denying his motion for a continuance. “Granting or denying a motion for continuance rests in the sound discretion of the presiding judge and his decision will' not be disturbed on appeal, except for abuse of discretion or a showing the defendant has been deprived of a fair trial.” State v. Ipock, 242 N.C. 119, 86 S.E. 2d 798; State v. Birchfield, 235 N.C. 410, 70 S.E. 2d 5. Defendant’s motion for continuance was on the grounds that the solicitor’s action in arraigning him in the presence of the prospective…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. McNeelySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. . JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. . HollandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. . DavenportSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. State v. PattonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. State v. BettsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  5. State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API