Legal Opinion

Clairol Inc. v. L. H. Martin Value Center, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMario Pittoni, J.

Plaintiff moves for a temporary injunction forbidding the defendant from buying, displaying, offering for sale at retail, or selling at retail Miss Clairol Hair Color Bath or any product manufactured or distributed by Clairol Incorporated and bearing any of its trade-marks or trade names which (1) is not labeled in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the New York Education Law; or (2) does not bear adequate instructions as furnished by the plaintiff; or (3) is not enclosed in the original, single bottle carton in which each such product was placed…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Warnaco Inc. v. VF Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
  2. Clairol, Inc. v. Boston Discount Center of Berkley, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  3. John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Pete-N-Larry's Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1994
  4. Clairol Inc. v. Cosmetics PlusNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Clairol, Inc. v. Martin Wholesale Distributors, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API