Warnaco Inc. v. VF Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants VF Corporation (“VF”) and Vives Vidal, S.A. have moved, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order dismissing plaintiffs Warnaco Inc. and Warnaco International Inc.’s (collectively, “Warnaco”) first amended complaint (the “Complaint”) in its entirety as to VF and dismissing Counts II, III, IV, and V of the Complaint as to Vives Vidal, S.A. For the following reasons, the Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.
The Parties
Plaintiff Warnaco Inc. is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Terra International, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Mississippi Chemical Corporation, a Mississippi CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- MBIA Ins. Corp. v. Royal Bank of CanadaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Jennings v. Hunt Cos.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Juicy Couture, Inc. v. Bella International Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Horsehead Industries, Inc. v. Metallgesellschaft AG.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.