Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Abbaszadeh

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 25, 2003No. C036850Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

SIMS, Acting P. J., Concurring and Dissenting.

I concur in the unpublished portion of the majority opinion, where the majority concludes that various of defendant’s contentions of prejudicial error are not meritorious.

I also concur in the majority’s conclusion that voir dire was improper and in the majority’s decision to report Judge O’Flaherty’s conduct to the Commission on Judicial Performance.

However, I respectfully dissent from the reversal of the judgment. In my view, defendant has forfeited his right to complain of Judge O’Flaherty’s improper voir dire because trial counsel failed to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Doers v. Golden Gate Bridge, Higway & Transportation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. VisciottiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. People v. SeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. SanchezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API