Legal Opinion
Luxury International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided September 23, 1999No. 99-02-00093; SLIP OP. 99-101PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.
Plaintiff, Luxury International, Inc. (“Luxury”), brings this action to contest the denial of a protest and invokes the jurisdiction of this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1581(a) and (i) (1994).
Luxury filed a protest challenging the United States Customs Service’s (“Customs”) decision to continue to detain its goods. Luxury’s protest was based on its view that ZAO “Elorg” and its exclusive licensee, The Tetris Company, LLC (“Tet-ris Co.”) (collectively “ZAO”), failed to file a timely demand for exclusion and bond pursuant to 19 C.F.R. § 133.43 (1998) and that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Uniroyal, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Lowa, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Sumitomo Metals Industries, Ltd. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
- Vivitar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Stuhlbarg International Sales Company, Inc., a California Corporation, D/B/A Sisco v. John D. Brush and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Shah Brothers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010
- Luxury International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000