Legal Opinion
Masonry Masters, Inc. v. Meese
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 13, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-0201PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Masonry Masters, a construction contracting company in the metropolitan Washington, D.C. area, seeks to hire Rigoberto Perdomo as a bricklayer. Perdomo is a resident alien, and cannot be hired unless the Department of Labor certifies that his employment will not deprive willing and able Americans of a job and will not adversely affect the wages and working conditions of persons with similar jobs. 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182(a)(14). Once certified, aliens must petition the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) for a sixth preference visa,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Rios-PinedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Masonry Masters, Inc., Successor to Tenco Masonry, Inc., Rigoberto Perdomo v. Richard Thornburgh, Attorney General of the U.S.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Chi-Feng Chang v. ThornburghDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1989