Legal Opinion

United Production Corp. v. Chesser

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 28, 1938No. 8431PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.

A motion for rehearing contends that we are wrong in holding that Thornhill knew of the first breaking of the gooseneck in the forenoon before he was killed by the second breaking in the afternoon; and that in saying, “If he did not look to see how the rig was set up for his work he was himself contributorily negligent. If he did look, he assumed the risk of using it as it was,” we have imported the law of master and servant into a case wh„ere that relationship does not exist. ■

“Assumption of risk” is a term employed in the law of master and servant to express the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Southern Pac. Co. v. McCreadyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Mrs. Eva Wright and the Standard Insurance Company, IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. L. E. Whitham Const. Co. v. RemerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. Amacker v. Skelly Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  4. United Production Corp. v. ChesserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  5. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Mrs. Eva Wright and the Standard Insurance Company, IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API