Legal Opinion
Southern Pac. Co. v. McCready
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1931No. 6297PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This ease was before this court on a former appeal, where a full statement of the facts as then presented will be found. McCready v. Southern Pac. Co., 26 F.(2d) 569, 570. After reciting the facts on the former appeal, Judge Dietrich stated the questions for decision as follows:
“The questions for consideration therefore are whether the facts as above recited make a prima facie case of actionable negligence, and, if so, whether they disclose such contributory negligence as in law bars recovery.”
The first question was answer-ed in the affirmative, the second in the…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- B. Shoninger Co. v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Mosheuvel v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Eastern Shore Public Service Co. v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
- Swift & Co. v. SchusterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Murphy v. El Dorado Bowl, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Amacker v. Skelly Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- United Production Corp. v. ChesserCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.