Legal Opinion

Chappell v. National Surety Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The appellant assigns for error his Honor’s ruling that Chappell and the Pratt Lumber Company are not estopped in this action by reason of their failure to file their claims with the special master appointed in the ancillary cause. In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina the Pratt Lumber Company instituted a suit in equity against the T. H. Gill Company, in which intervening creditors prayed the court to adjudge that their claims were entitled to priority in the disposition of the amounts due the receiver over the claims of the defendant’s general…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Boddie v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Welfare v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  3. Waddill v. . MastenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Coleman v. . FullerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Patterson v. . FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. WallerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  2. Barnes v. . CrawfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Harrison v. Southern Transit Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Davis v. . AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Overman & Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API