Legal Opinion
Heiar v. Crawford County, Wis.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 14, 1983No. 82-C-273PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SHABAZ, District Judge.
This is a civil action for monetary and equitable relief. Plaintiffs, each a former Deputy Sheriff for Crawford County, allege that their rights were violated when the Crawford County Board enacted a mandatory retirement resolution. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that defendants violated their rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. 1 Defendants’ motion to dismiss these claims will be considered in this Memorandum and Order. 2
FACTS
For the purposes of this motion, the allegations in the amended complaint…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Heiar v. Crawford CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- 35 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1458, 36 Fair empl.prac.cas. 112, 35 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 34,614 Wesley N. Heiar, Kenneth I. Strauman, and Myrl E. Brown, Cross-Appellants v. Crawford County, Wisconsin, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Redwood v. LiermanAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Callaway v. HafemanDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986
- Wagner v. GENESEE COUNTY BD. OF COM'RSDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.