Price v. Farmers Insurance
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
In this case, this court is asked to decide whether an insurer may offset amounts it paid its insured as personal injury protection (PIP) benefits against amounts payable to the insured under an underinsured motorist (UIM) endorsement. We find that the insurance policy at issue here contains an unambiguous reimbursement clause that permits the insurer an offset. Accordingly, we reverse and remand.
Cline Price was injured in an automobile accident on March 30, 1991. He carried automobile insurance, with both PIP and UIM coverage, through Farmers Insurance Company of Washington. Farmers paid…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Keenan v. INDUSTRIAL INDEMNITY INS. CO. OF NORTHWESTWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- Barney v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Boyd v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- Price v. Farmers Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Price v. Farmers InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Kohfeld v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Kohfeld v. United Pacific Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Woodley v. Safeco Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.