McKinney v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAY, Justice.
Jeffrey Lane McKinney was convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated sexual assault. After he pled “True” to an enhancement count, the jury assessed his punishment at seventy-five years in prison. McKinney raises one point of error, contending his conviction is invalid because the voir dire was conducted by a magistrate.
We overrule the point of error and affirm the conviction.
McKinney does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction; thus we will not detail the facts of the assault. His sole point of error states that the conviction is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Ex Parte RussellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Woodland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lemasurier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Fain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
- Roderick Nash v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Fennell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.