Legal Opinion

McKinney v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 3, 1994No. 2-93-254-CRPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAY, Justice.

Jeffrey Lane McKinney was convicted by a jury of the offense of aggravated sexual assault. After he pled “True” to an enhancement count, the jury assessed his punishment at seventy-five years in prison. McKinney raises one point of error, contending his conviction is invalid because the voir dire was conducted by a magistrate.

We overrule the point of error and affirm the conviction.

McKinney does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction; thus we will not detail the facts of the assault. His sole point of error states that the conviction is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Briggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Ex Parte RussellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Woodland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lemasurier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
  2. Fain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Roderick Nash v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2003
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  5. Fennell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API