Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 19, 1996No. 2-95-341-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

Appellant Tyrone Eugene Davis challenges his conviction for possession of cocaine because he contends that the magistrate who accepted the guilty plea lacked jurisdiction. We sustain Davis’s sole point of error.

BACKGROUND

Davis was indicted on March 24, 1992 for possession of cocaine of less than twenty-eight grams. He entered into an agreement with the State in which he would plead guilty and the State would recommend that his two-to twenty-year sentence be probated for eight years. Among the conditions of probation was the requirement that Davis report regularly to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whetstone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Ex Parte StaceyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Trcka v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  5. Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Fain v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  3. Caldwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Fennell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Eric Gerard Holmes Jr. v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API