Legal Opinion
Wheeler v. Gleason
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action to reform a conveyance of water rights alleged to have been fraudulently obtained. Demurrer to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
The only ground of demurrer which impresses me as serious is the fourth, and I think that must he sustained on the ground that causes of action have been improperly united.
The complaint alleges that a large number of persons, composing the various plaintiffs and various defendants who did not unite as plaintiffs, were induced by the defendant Gleason by false and fraudulent representations to convey certain "water rights to him.
*605There were two sets of papers -executed, one by the owners of the lands through which the stream, in respect to which the water rights were granted, flowed, and the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The New-York and New Haven R.R. v. . Schuyler, Cross, C.New York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Howell v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- Bradley v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Miller v. Arizona BankArizona Supreme Court · 1935