Legal Opinion
Jewelcor Inc. v. Karfunkel
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 11, 2008No. 05-2244, 05-4121, 06-4003PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
POLLAK, District Judge.
Appellants Michael and George Kar-funkel, individually and as partners trading as M & G Equities (collectively referred to herein as “M & G”), appeal orders of the District Court denying M & G’s motion to dismiss a breach-of-lease claim brought by appellees, Jewel-cor Incorporated et. al. (“Jeweleor”), awarding judgment in favor of Jeweleor, and granting Jeweleor attorneys’ fees. The District Court had diversity jurisdiction over this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 and this court holds jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Appellants argue that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ragan v. Merchants Transfer & Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- William N. Clark v. Modern Group Ltd. John F. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Sheridan v. NGK Metals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Estate of MehlmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Crystallex International Corp. v. Petróleos De Venezuela, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Knopick v. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Levine v. First American Title InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.