Legal Opinion
In re M.A.C.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided October 27, 2000No. 96-FS-19PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAGNER, Chief Judge:
Appellant, M.A.C., appeals from an adjudication of delinquency based upon the trial court’s finding that he was guilty of first degree murder. M.A.C., who was fifteen-years-old at the time of the offense and his arrest, contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion tó suppress his confession. He contends that, because of his intellectual limitations, he did not voluntarily and knowingly waive his Miranda rights.1 He also argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress identification testimony of an eyewitness, which he contends was unduly…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- CHARLES S. TURNER,CHRISTOPHER D. TURNER,RUSSELL L. OVERTON, LEVY ROUSE, CLIFTON E. YARBOROUGH, KELVIN D. SMITH, & TIMOTHY CATLETTDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Di Giovanni v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- Dean v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Forte v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.