Legal Opinion

Bigler v. Bigler

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 31, 1927No. 11,930PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mi:. Justice Adams

delivered the opinion of the court.

Frank Bigler, defendant in error, the executor named in the last will and testament of Mary Bigler, deceased, presented her will for probato in the county court, and applied for letters testamentary. Charles H. Bigler, plaintiff in error, was one of the heirs and legatees of deceased who was cited to appear. He filed no caveat or objections to the probate of the will in the county court, as provided in § 5211, C. L. 1921, or at all. On the contrary he signed the following consent and waiver, endorsed on the citation: “I hereby waive service…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. ShimeallIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Garf v. WeitzmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Suter v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Deason v. LewisColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Wilson v. Van ZantSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. Austin v. First Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1930
  5. Fulton v. LathropSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API