Legal Opinion

Manz v. Continental American Life Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 31, 1993No. 9005-02899; CA A68487PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant, assigning as error the trial court’s granting of a portion of defendant’s motion for summary judgment and its denial of plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

Plaintiff is insured under a group health insurance policy issued by defendant. The policy, which is held by an Illinois trustee, covers the employees and their dependents of a Washington business, Hal’s Motor Clinic (Hal’s). After incurring medical expenses that were covered under the terms of the policy, plaintiff submitted a claim . Defendant denied that claim, because it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hofeld v. Nationwide Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Erwin v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Uslife Credit Life Insurance v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Angelini v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Fields v. Legacy Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  4. Waller v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. Manz v. Continental American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API