Manz v. Continental American Life Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Plaintiff appeals a judgment for defendant, assigning as error the trial court’s granting of a portion of defendant’s motion for summary judgment and its denial of plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment. We reverse.
Plaintiff is insured under a group health insurance policy issued by defendant. The policy, which is held by an Illinois trustee, covers the employees and their dependents of a Washington business, Hal’s Motor Clinic (Hal’s). After incurring medical expenses that were covered under the terms of the policy, plaintiff submitted a claim . Defendant denied that claim, because it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hofeld v. Nationwide Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Lilienthal v. KaufmanOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Erwin v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Uslife Credit Life Insurance v. McAfeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Angelini v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. SandersOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Fields v. Legacy Health SystemCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Waller v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Manz v. Continental American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.