Waller v. Auto-Owners Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Plaintiff initiated this breach of contract action against defendant Auto-Owners, her parents’ automobile insurance carrier, to recover underinsured motorist (UIM) benefits. The trial court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment, concluding as a matter of law that, because she was a resident of Oregon at the time of the accident, plaintiff was not covered under her parents’ Florida insurance policies. Plaintiff appeals. Because we conclude that a genuine issue of material fact exists, see ORCP 47 C, we reverse and remand.
The following background facts, which are not disputed, gave…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
- Davis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Angelini v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Manz v. Continental American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- First Far West Transportation, Inc. v. Carolina Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Spirit Partners, LP v. Stoel Rives LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- Giuliano v. Anchorage Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2014
- Bresee Homes, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- Alterra Am. Ins. Co. v. James W. Fowler Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2018
- Powell v. System Transport Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.