Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Johnson

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 16, 1970PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

The Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in her favor for damages for personal injuries received in an automobile accident on the ground that the damages were inadequate. She seeks an Additur or in the alternative a new trial on damages only.

The accident occurred in May 1965. Liability is to be determined at common law, and not under the “comparative negligence” statute of 1967. 14 M.R.S.A. § 156. Negligence of the Defendant and lack of contributory negligence of the Plaintiff are not disputed.

Without question, the Plaintiff received severe injuries. The question is what portion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Leavitt v. DowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1908
  2. Conroy v. ReidSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1933
  3. Houle v. Tondreau Bros. Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  4. Pease v. ShapiroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1949
  5. F. X. Bilodeau Realty, Inc. v. Lewiston Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  2. Cope v. SevignySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  3. State v. HarnischSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Elizabeth T. Jalbert v. Maine Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. Elizabeth T. Jalbert v. Maine Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API