Legal Opinion
Peto v. Howell
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 14, 1938No. 6625PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff sued to recover damages alleged to have been caused by a monopoly by defendant in violation of Section 2, Chapter 1, Title 15, U.S.C.A., which provides that “every person who shall monopolize, or attempt to monopolize, * * * any part of the trade or commerce among the several States * * * shall be deemed guilty” of a violation of the law, suing under Title 15, Chapter 1, Section 15, U.S.C.A., providing that any person injured in his business or property by reason of any violation of the Anti-Trust Laws may sue and recover three-fold the damages by him…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. Loew's, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Cargill, Inc. v. HardinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Great Western Food Distributors, Inc. v. BrannanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.