Legal Opinion

Collins v. Lantz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff is a mechanical contractor who is suing for damages to a steam tunnel he had constructed but had not yet turned over to the owner at the time it was damaged. The defendant Dayton Plumbing and Heating, Inc., is another mechanical contractor who connected a steam line into plaintiff’s steam tunnel. Defendant Annand was the owner’s architect for the entire project and designed and partially supervised the project. The trial court, as the trier of fact, found for the defendants and the plaintiff appeals.

This particular steam tunnel damage is one of our most litigated causes. Collins…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Larson v. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Collins v. POSTOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Collins v. LantzOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. State Highway Commission Ex Rel. Pantovich Construction Co. v. BrassfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oregon, State Highway Com'n v. DeLong Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. Thompson v. CoatsOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Thompson v. School District No. UH7JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  4. Thompson v. CoatsOregon Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API