Legal Opinion

Collins v. Lantz

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1963PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff seeks to recover approximately $9,000 expended by him in repairing a steam tunnel which plaintiff alleges was damaged by the negligent conduct of the defendants. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment based upon an order sustaining a demurrer interposed by defendant Lantz.

Plaintiff’s complaint alleges that the defendants were negligent in certain particulars and that the negligence of the defendants “combined, concurred and was the proximate cause of the damages suffered by the plaintiff.” Defendant Lantz demurred on the ground that it appeared upon the face of the complaint that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Watkins v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Martin v. CITY OF ASHLANDOregon Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steenson v. RobinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lulay v. EarleOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Dlouhy v. Simpson Timber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Collins v. LantzOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  5. General Construction Co. v. Oregon State Fish CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API