Legal Opinion
Schmidt v. Creedon
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 29, 2011No. 09-2051, 10-1633PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROTH, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves the application of the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause to the suspension of policemen in Pennsylvania. Michael Schmidt, an officer in Pennsylvania’s Capitol Police, claims that appellees, senior officers of the Capitol Police and officials of Pennsylvania’s Department of General Services, violated his due process rights when they failed to provide him a hearing before suspending him without pay. In deciding this appeal, we keep in mind that, classified employees under Pennsylvania’s Civil Service Act cannot be suspended or terminated…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Daniel J. Ciambriello v. County of Nassau, Civil Service Employees Association, Inc., Russell Rinchiuso, Richard Cotugno and Ron RoeillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Jill Mancini v. Northampton CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Clukey v. Town of CamdenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- National Amusements Inc. v. Borough of PalmyraCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Paul Montemuro v. Jim Thorpe Area School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2024
- Keith Collier v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.