Kinkead v. Spillers
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtDonald L. Corbin, Justice
Appellants Robert and Joyce Joyce Kinkead appeal the judgment of the Pulaski County Chancery Court ordering a partition sale of land previously owned by Appellant Robert Kinkead and Appellees Carol Ann Kinkead Spillers and Jeannine Lea Kinkead Mathis. Appellants raise three points on appeal: (1) the chancery court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to order partition due to adverse possession of part of the land; (2) the sales price of the land was grossly inadequate; and (3) the costs of a second survey should not have been imposed upon Appellants pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 18-60-418…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Moore v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Asheey v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
- Criscoe v. HambrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
- Byers v. DanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
- London v. OverbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Trice v. TriceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
- Williams v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007