Legal Opinion

Kinkead v. Spillers

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 14, 1999No. 98-618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonald L. Corbin, Justice

Appellants Robert and Joyce Joyce Kinkead appeal the judgment of the Pulaski County Chancery Court ordering a partition sale of land previously owned by Appellant Robert Kinkead and Appellees Carol Ann Kinkead Spillers and Jeannine Lea Kinkead Mathis. Appellants raise three points on appeal: (1) the chancery court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to order partition due to adverse possession of part of the land; (2) the sales price of the land was grossly inadequate; and (3) the costs of a second survey should not have been imposed upon Appellants pursuant to Ark. Code Ann. § 18-60-418…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moore v. GordonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  2. Asheey v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1892
  3. Criscoe v. HambrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  4. Byers v. DanleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1871
  5. London v. OverbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Trice v. TriceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Williams v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API