Legal Opinion

United States v. Preston Coleman

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 4, 2017No. 17-5058UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEAGUE, Circuit Judge.

Preston Coleman appeals the district court’s second revocation of his supervised release. After a hearing, the court found that Coleman violated the conditions of his supervised release by raping an acquaintance, C.B. In this appeal, Coleman asks us to: (1) reweigh the evidence and find that he did not commit the rape, and (2) remand for resentencing in light of “assistance” he provided to the government. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in revoking his release or in imposing his sentence, we affirm.

I

This case involves Coleman’s challenge…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. ConatserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Northland Insurance Company v. Stewart Title Guaranty Company, Cailu Title Corporation, Donald G. Sare, Jr., and Kelly L. SareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Mike DarwichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dorothy Bivens v. Zep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
  2. United States v. Allante WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API